Sekundärliteratur:Markus: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Die Offene Bibel

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Zeile 12: Zeile 12:
 
===Textkritik===
 
===Textkritik===
 
: ''Zum Markusschluss s. [[Sekundärliteratur:Markus 16]].''
 
: ''Zum Markusschluss s. [[Sekundärliteratur:Markus 16]].''
 +
 +
* Brown, Scott G. (2003): [https://www.academia.edu/4604822/On_the_Composition_History_of_the_Longer_Secret_Gospel_of_Mark On the Composition History of the Longer ("Secret") Gospel of Mark], in: JBL 122, 89–110. (academia.edu)
  
 
* Evans, Craig (2011): [http://craigaevans.com/Morton-Smith-and-the-Secret-Gospel-of-Mark.pdf Morton Smith and the Secret Gospel of Mark: Exploring the Grounds for Doubt] - Paper presented at a conference hosted by York University, Toronto 2011, erwartet Veröffentlichung in Sammelband.
 
* Evans, Craig (2011): [http://craigaevans.com/Morton-Smith-and-the-Secret-Gospel-of-Mark.pdf Morton Smith and the Secret Gospel of Mark: Exploring the Grounds for Doubt] - Paper presented at a conference hosted by York University, Toronto 2011, erwartet Veröffentlichung in Sammelband.
Zeile 23: Zeile 25:
 
===Einleitung===
 
===Einleitung===
 
* Hooker, Morna (1991): [http://www.lastseminary.com/mark/Translation%20and%20Commentary%20on%20Mark%201.1-45.pdf Translation and Commentary on Mark 1.1-45], Einleitung aus dem Kommentar „The Gospel According to Saint Mark“
 
* Hooker, Morna (1991): [http://www.lastseminary.com/mark/Translation%20and%20Commentary%20on%20Mark%201.1-45.pdf Translation and Commentary on Mark 1.1-45], Einleitung aus dem Kommentar „The Gospel According to Saint Mark“
 +
 +
* Guijarro, Santiago (2003): [https://www.academia.edu/2187916/Why_does_the_Gospel_of_Mark_Begin_as_it_Does Why does the Gospel of Mark Begin as it Does?], in: Biblical Theology Bulletin 33, 28-38.  (academia.edu)
 +
*: Abstract: ''Mark’s Gospel does not follow the rules of Hellenistic “lives”, which usually began by praising the ancestry and education of the main character. This is due to the fact that the data available to Mark were inappropriate for that purpose. Nonetheless, the beginning of Mark’s Gospel has the same purpose as the beginnings of other contemporary biographies: to show the ascribed honour of his character. According to Mark, Jesus’ honour does not come from his human family; it is due to his being God’s Son. Through a ritual process, centred upon a liminal stage of revelation and testing, the evangelist shows Jesus’ true identity as a holy man, capable of brokering God’s patronage on his people.''
  
 
* Hurtado, Larry (1989): [http://www.lastseminary.com/mark/Introduction%20to%20Mark.pdf Einleitung] aus dem Kommentar Mark (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series)
 
* Hurtado, Larry (1989): [http://www.lastseminary.com/mark/Introduction%20to%20Mark.pdf Einleitung] aus dem Kommentar Mark (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series)
 +
 +
* Larsen, Kevin (2004): [https://www.academia.edu/4408202/THE_STRUCTURE_OF_MARKS_GOSPEL_CURRENT_PROPOSALS The Structure of Mark's Gospel. Current Proposals], in: Currents in Biblical Research 3/1, 143-64. (academia.edu)
  
 
* Moloney, Francis J. (2012): [http://www.lastseminary.com/mark/Introduction%20-%20The%20Gospel%20of%20Mark%20-%20A%20Commentary.pdf Einleitung] aus dem Kommentar The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary.
 
* Moloney, Francis J. (2012): [http://www.lastseminary.com/mark/Introduction%20-%20The%20Gospel%20of%20Mark%20-%20A%20Commentary.pdf Einleitung] aus dem Kommentar The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary.
Zeile 70: Zeile 77:
 
* Guijarro, Santiago (2007): [https://www.academia.edu/2187933/The_First_Disciples_of_Jesus_in_Galilee The first disciples of Jesus in Galilee], in: HTS 63(3) 2007 (academia.edu)
 
* Guijarro, Santiago (2007): [https://www.academia.edu/2187933/The_First_Disciples_of_Jesus_in_Galilee The first disciples of Jesus in Galilee], in: HTS 63(3) 2007 (academia.edu)
 
*: Untersucht 2:1-3:6.
 
*: Untersucht 2:1-3:6.
 +
 +
* Hietbrink, Jonathan (2002): [https://www.academia.edu/2327258/The_Kingdom_of_God_in_the_Gospel_of_Mark The Kingdom of God in the Gospel of Mark: A Theological Interpretation], Senior Honors Project (academia.edu)
  
 
* Kirchhevel, Gordon D. (1999): [https://www.ibr-bbr.org/files/bbr/BBR_1999_10_Kirchhevel_SonOfManMark.pdf The Son of Man Passages in Mark], in: BBR 9 (1999), 181-187
 
* Kirchhevel, Gordon D. (1999): [https://www.ibr-bbr.org/files/bbr/BBR_1999_10_Kirchhevel_SonOfManMark.pdf The Son of Man Passages in Mark], in: BBR 9 (1999), 181-187
Zeile 79: Zeile 88:
  
 
* Wördemann, Dirk (2002): [http://digi20.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fontsize.3/object/display/bsb00045529_00002.html?prox=true&phone=true&context=Das+Evangelium+nach&ngram=true&hl=scan&fulltext=Das+Evangelium+nach&mode=simple Das Charakterbild im bios nach Plutarch und das Christusbild im Evangelium nach Markus], Paderborn 2002
 
* Wördemann, Dirk (2002): [http://digi20.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fontsize.3/object/display/bsb00045529_00002.html?prox=true&phone=true&context=Das+Evangelium+nach&ngram=true&hl=scan&fulltext=Das+Evangelium+nach&mode=simple Das Charakterbild im bios nach Plutarch und das Christusbild im Evangelium nach Markus], Paderborn 2002
 +
 +
* Voth, Trent (2012): [https://www.academia.edu/3395082/Usurping_the_Cross_Marks_Gospel_of_Jesus_and_its_Counter-Imperial_Messages Usurping the Cross: Mark's Gospel of Jesus and its Counter-Imperial Messages], Master-Arbeit Fresno Pacific University Biblical Seminary. (academia.edu)
  
 
===Sonstiges===
 
===Sonstiges===
 
* [http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/imperia/md/content/nt/nt/aktuellevorlesungen/vorlesungsskriptedownload/ws11-12/skript_markusevangelium__ws_2011_rub.pdf Vorlesungskript] von Thomas Söding, 2011, 91 S. mit Bibliographie und Einleitung.
 
* [http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/imperia/md/content/nt/nt/aktuellevorlesungen/vorlesungsskriptedownload/ws11-12/skript_markusevangelium__ws_2011_rub.pdf Vorlesungskript] von Thomas Söding, 2011, 91 S. mit Bibliographie und Einleitung.

Version vom 12. März 2014, 16:22 Uhr

S.a. die Sammlung bei Open-Access-Werken zu Markus auf Biblicalstudies.org.uk und lastseminary.com

Bibliographien[Bearbeiten]

Textkritik[Bearbeiten]

Zum Markusschluss s. Sekundärliteratur:Markus 16.
  • Head, Peter (2012): The Early Text of Mark, in: The Early Text of the New Testament (Hg. Charles E. Hill and Michael J. Kruger), Oxford 2012, 108-120.

Einleitung[Bearbeiten]

  • Guijarro, Santiago (2003): Why does the Gospel of Mark Begin as it Does?, in: Biblical Theology Bulletin 33, 28-38. (academia.edu)
    Abstract: Mark’s Gospel does not follow the rules of Hellenistic “lives”, which usually began by praising the ancestry and education of the main character. This is due to the fact that the data available to Mark were inappropriate for that purpose. Nonetheless, the beginning of Mark’s Gospel has the same purpose as the beginnings of other contemporary biographies: to show the ascribed honour of his character. According to Mark, Jesus’ honour does not come from his human family; it is due to his being God’s Son. Through a ritual process, centred upon a liminal stage of revelation and testing, the evangelist shows Jesus’ true identity as a holy man, capable of brokering God’s patronage on his people.
  • Hurtado, Larry (1989): Einleitung aus dem Kommentar Mark (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series)
  • Moloney, Francis J. (2012): Einleitung aus dem Kommentar The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary.

Sprache, Argumentation, Stil[Bearbeiten]

Kommentare[Bearbeiten]

S.a. die Kommentar-Bibliographie.
  • DeWelt, Don / B. W. Johnson (1965): The Gospel of Mark (=Bible Study Textbook 27). Joplin.
  • Lührmann, Dieter: Das Markusevangelium (HNT), Tübingen 1987

Einzelstudien[Bearbeiten]

the Angels Waited on Him” (Mark 1:13): Hospitality and Discipleship in Mark’s Gospel], in: Conspectus 8/2009, 1-25 (academia.edu)

An Alternative Spatial Practice in the Gospel of Mark], Dissertation Notre Dame

Sonstiges[Bearbeiten]

  • Vorlesungskript von Thomas Söding, 2011, 91 S. mit Bibliographie und Einleitung.