Ben (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Ben (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
===Der Markus-Schluss=== | ===Der Markus-Schluss=== | ||
* Bruce, F.F. (1945): [http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/eq/2nd_gospel_bruce.pdf The End of the Second Gospel], in: The Evangelical Quarterly 17, 169-181 | * Bruce, F.F. (1945): [http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/eq/2nd_gospel_bruce.pdf The End of the Second Gospel], in: The Evangelical Quarterly 17, 169-181 | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Carrier, Richard (2009): [http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php?title=Legends2 Mark 16:9-20 as Forgery or Fabrication] (atheistische Apologetik, aber es liegt offenbar solide Arbeit zugrunde) | ||
* Goodspeed, Edgar J. (1905): [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3154456?seq=1 The Original Conclusion of the Gospel of Mark], in: The American Journal of Theology 9/3, 484-490 | * Goodspeed, Edgar J. (1905): [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3154456?seq=1 The Original Conclusion of the Gospel of Mark], in: The American Journal of Theology 9/3, 484-490 | ||
| Zeile 14: | Zeile 16: | ||
* Williams, Joel F. (1999): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/42/42-1/42-1-pp021-035_JETS.pdf Literary Approaches to the End of Mark's Gospel], in: JETS 42/1, 21-35 | * Williams, Joel F. (1999): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/42/42-1/42-1-pp021-035_JETS.pdf Literary Approaches to the End of Mark's Gospel], in: JETS 42/1, 21-35 | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Williams, Travis B. (2010): [https://www.academia.edu/1444542/Bringing_Method_to_the_Madness_Examining_the_Style_of_the_Longer_Ending_of_Mark Bringing Method to the Madness: Examining the Style of the Longer Ending of Mark], in: BBR 20.3, 397–418 (academia.edu) | ||
* Willker, Wieland (2013): [http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/index.html A Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels. Bd. 2b: The various endings of Mk], <sup>10</sup>2013 | * Willker, Wieland (2013): [http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/index.html A Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels. Bd. 2b: The various endings of Mk], <sup>10</sup>2013 | ||
Version vom 17. März 2014, 19:11 Uhr
Der Markus-Schluss
- Bruce, F.F. (1945): The End of the Second Gospel, in: The Evangelical Quarterly 17, 169-181
- Carrier, Richard (2009): Mark 16:9-20 as Forgery or Fabrication (atheistische Apologetik, aber es liegt offenbar solide Arbeit zugrunde)
- Goodspeed, Edgar J. (1905): The Original Conclusion of the Gospel of Mark, in: The American Journal of Theology 9/3, 484-490
- Stein, Robert H. (2008): The Ending of Mark, in: Bulletin for Biblical Research 18/1, 79–98
- Snapp, James (2008): The Origin of Mark 16:9-20
- Viele Informationen auch auf der Seite des Verfassers: http://www.textexcavation.com/snapp/ Willker (s.o. S. 25) lobt ihn als sehr gründlich, aber auch als einseitig. Private Veröffentlichung.
- Spencer, Aída Besançon (2007): The Denial of the Good News and the Ending of Mark, in: BBR 17/2, 269–28
- Thomas, John Christopher (1983): A Reconsideration of the Ending of Mark, in: JETS 26/4, 407-419
- Williams, Joel F. (1999): Literary Approaches to the End of Mark's Gospel, in: JETS 42/1, 21-35
- Williams, Travis B. (2010): Bringing Method to the Madness: Examining the Style of the Longer Ending of Mark, in: BBR 20.3, 397–418 (academia.edu)
- Willker, Wieland (2013): A Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels. Bd. 2b: The various endings of Mk, 102013
- Yang, Jayhoon (2003): Other Endings of Mark as Responses to Mark: An Ideological-Critical Investigation into the Longer and the Shorter Ending of Mark's Gospel. Dissertation Sheffield
Mk 16,1-8
- Bolt, Peter G. (1996): Mark 16:1-8: The Empty Tomb of a Hero?, in: Tyndale Bulletin 47/1, 27-37
- Lincoln, Andrew T. (1989): The Promise and the Failure: Mark 16:7, 8, in: JBL 108/2, 283-300