Sekundärliteratur:Biblische Exegese: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Methodik der Exegese

Du Plooy, H. (2002): Listening to the wind in the trees: meaning, interpretation and literary theory, in: Acta Theologica 22/1. S. 266-279.

Freund, Richard A. (1986): Revisionist Intellectual History and the Bible.

Gundry, Stanley M. S.T.M. (1969): Typology as a Means of Interpretation: Past and Present.

Kauhaus, Hanna (2009): Wege der Bibelauslegung im 18. Jahrhundert. Studien zur Exegese in einem geistigen Cluster zwischen Theologie, Philosophie und Frömmigkeit. Link [Dissertation]

Kourie, C. (2011): Reading Scripture through a mystical lens, in: Acta Theologica Supplementum 15. S. 132-153.

Longenecker, Bruce (2002): The Narrative Approach to Paul: An Early Retrospective.

Levinsohn, Stephen H. (2006): The relevance of Greek discourse studies to exegesis, in: JOT 2/06. S. 11-21.

Norwood, W. Berry (2010): The Church Fathers and the Deity of Christ, in: American Theological Inquiry 1/2010. S. 17-33

[1. Hälfte: Über typologische Lesart]

Payne, J. Barton (1960): Hermenutics as a Cloac for the Denial of Scripture.

Simkins, Ronald A. (2011): Biblical Studies as a Secular Discipline. The Role of Faith and Theology.

Sommer, Benjamin D. (2006): The Source Critic and the Religious Interpreter.

Tolmie, D.F. (2005): Die impak van metodologie op die verstaan van die Nuwe Testament, in: Acta Theologica 25/2. S. 157-182.

Turner, George A. (1961): Recent Trends in Biblical Studies.

van Leeuwen, Raymond (2011): The Quest for the Historical Leviathan: Truth and Method in Biblical Studies.

van Zyl, H.C. (2008): Reading the New Testament from a theological perspective, in: Acta Theologica 28/2. S. 133-145.

Waaijman, K. (2011): Biblical spirituality: an “other” reading (allègoria), in: Acta Theologica Supplement 15. S. 1-20.

Weinandy, Thomas O.F.M. (2008): Why Ask The Fathers? The Dynamics of a Living Tradition, in: American Theological Inquiry 1/2008. S. 6-10

Zimmermann, R. (2009): How to understand the parables of Jesus. A paradigm shift in parable exegesis, in: Acta Theologica 29/1. S. 157-182

Bibelkritik

Paul, William W. (1960): Has there been a Shift in the Presuppositions of Criticism?

Schultz, Samuel S. (1960): Today´s Critic - Presuppositions, Tools and Methods.

Tenney, Merrill C. (1960): The Legitimate Limits of Biblical Criticism.

Geschichte der Exegese

Harris, Robert (?): Jewish Biblical Exegesis from its Beginnings to the Twelfth Century.

Biblische Interpretation in parabiblischen Texten

Segal, Michael (1998): Biblical Exegesis in 4Q158: Techniques and Genre.

Segal, Michael (2011): Identifying Biblical Interpretation in Parabiblical Texts.

Rabbinische Exegese

Cohen, Martin Samuel (1990): The Names of biblical Verses.

über den Aspekt rabbinischer Auslegung, einzelnen Versen Namen zu geben

Mittelalterliche Exegese

De Visscher, Eva Sarah (2003): The Jewish-Christian Dialogue in Twelfth-Century Western Europe: the Hebrew and Latin Sources of Herbert of Bosham´s Commentary on the Psalms. Leeds.

Goldstein, Israel (1987): Maimonides´ Approach to the Bible.

Harris, Robert (2007): Rashi´s Introductions to His Biblical Commentaries.

Harris, Robert (2008): Rashi and the 'Messianic' Psalms.

Harris, Robert (2009): Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis.

Harris, Robert (2009): Twelfth-Century Biblical Exegetes and the Invention of Literature.

Harris, Robert (2011): The Reception of Ezekiel in Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis.

Harris, Robert (2011): Leviticus Interpreted as Jewish Community.

@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
+==Methodik der Exegese==
 * Du Plooy, H. (2002): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/5464/29602 Listening to the wind in the trees: meaning, interpretation and literary theory], in: Acta Theologica 22/1. S. 266-279.
-: '''Abstract''': In this article the literary theories which dominated textual studies during the twentieth century are discussed briefly, indicating the philosophical roots of these theories. The article points out that whereas theories during the greater part of the twentieth century tended to encourage a more "open" approach to meaning and textuality, there are clear indications of a new awareness of textual constraints in the last decade. The point is made that interpreters and translators should be aware of the philosophical implications as well as of the textual constraints in the different forms of textual processing. In conclusion the responsibility of translators and interpreters of religious texts is emphasised.
+* Freund, Richard A. (1986): [http://jbq.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/14/jbq14.4.pdf Revisionist Intellectual History and the Bible].
+* Gundry, Stanley M. S.T.M. (1969): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/12/12-4/12-4-pp233-240_JETS.pdf Typology as a Means of Interpretation: Past and Present].
 * Kauhaus, Hanna (2009): Wege der Bibelauslegung im 18. Jahrhundert. Studien zur Exegese in einem geistigen Cluster zwischen Theologie, Philosophie und Frömmigkeit. [http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-21619/Kauhaus/Dissertation.pdf Link] [Dissertation]
+* Kourie, C. (2011): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/72914/61821 Reading Scripture through a mystical lens], in: Acta Theologica Supplementum 15. S. 132-153.
+* Longenecker, Bruce (2002): [http://baylor.academia.edu/BruceLongenecker/Papers/1643844/_The_Narrative_Approach_to_Paul_An_Early_Retrospective_Currents_in_Biblical_Research_1_2002_88-111._Reprinted_in_Paul_Foster_ed._New_Testament_Studies_Benchmarks_in_Religious_Studies_London_Sage_Publications_2010_ The Narrative Approach to Paul: An Early Retrospective].
+* Levinsohn, Stephen H. (2006): [http://www.sil.org/siljot/2006/2/48004/siljot2006-2-02.pdf The relevance of Greek discourse studies to exegesis], in: JOT 2/06. S. 11-21.
+* Norwood, W. Berry (2010): [http://atijournal.org/ATI_Vol3_No1.pdf The Church Fathers and the Deity of Christ], in: American Theological Inquiry 1/2010. S. 17-33
+: [1. Hälfte: Über typologische Lesart]
+* Payne, J. Barton (1960): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/3/3-4/BETS_3-4_93-100_Payne.pdf Hermenutics as a Cloac for the Denial of Scripture].
+* Simkins, Ronald A. (2011): [http://creighton.academia.edu/RonSimkins/Papers/1592487/Biblical_Studies_as_a_Secular_Discipline_The_Role_of_Faith_and_Theology Biblical Studies as a Secular Discipline. The Role of Faith and Theology].
+* Sommer, Benjamin D. (2006): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/BenjaminSommer/Papers/1827765/The_Source_Critic_and_the_Religious_Interpreter The Source Critic and the Religious Interpreter].
 * Tolmie, D.F. (2005): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/52303/40928 Die impak van metodologie op die verstaan van die Nuwe Testament], in: Acta Theologica 25/2. S. 157-182.
-: '''Abstract''': During the previous century many new methods for interpreting the New Testament were developed. In this article it is asked if new methods always enable better insight into the New Testament. Although it is conceded that this is not always the case, it is argued that the correct application of new methods can indeed facilitate new insights into the New Testament. This is then illustrated by examples from the narratological analysis of the Fourth Gospel and the rhetorical analysis of the Letter to the Galatians.
+* Turner, George A. (1961): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/4/4-2/BETS_4-2_11-16_Turner.pdf Recent Trends in Biblical Studies].
+* van Leeuwen, Raymond (2011): [http://eastern.academia.edu/RaymondVanLeeuwenVanLeeuwen/Papers/1008075/The_Quest_for_the_Historical_Leviathan_Truth_and_Method_in_Biblical_Studies The Quest for the Historical Leviathan: Truth and Method in Biblical Studies].
 * van Zyl, H.C. (2008): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/48888/35237 Reading the New Testament from a theological perspective], in: Acta Theologica 28/2. S. 133-145.
-: '''Abstract''': This article argues that, from the perspective of the faith community, it is not enough to read the Bible only from a “technical” point of view; a theological perspective is also required. Subsequently the article deals with what a theological reading entails: A reader-orientated and a text-orientated view are presented.
+* Waaijman, K. (2011): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/72908/61815 Biblical spirituality: an “other” reading (allègoria)], in: Acta Theologica Supplement 15. S. 1-20.
+* Weinandy, Thomas O.F.M. (2008): [http://atijournal.org/ATI_Vol1_No1.pdf Why Ask The Fathers? The Dynamics of a Living Tradition], in: American Theological Inquiry 1/2008. S. 6-10
 * Zimmermann, R. (2009): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/44175/27690 How to understand the parables of Jesus. A paradigm shift in parable exegesis], in: Acta Theologica 29/1. S. 157-182
-: '''Abstract''': For many years, the exegesis of the parables of Jesus was determined by assumptions that were largely purported by Adolf Jülicher and subsequently underwent only insignificant modification. The Kompendium der Gleichnisse Jesu (ed. R. Zimmermann, Gütersloh 2007), whose methodology and hermeneutics are explained in this article, takes a new route, as can be illustrated in four steps. From a historical perspective, parable exegesis is released from its close relationship to the search for the Historical Jesus and is given new distinction by a paradigm of Jesus “remembered”. The customary religious-historical standardization of the parables (particularly with reference to rabbinical parables) is critically investigated from a traditio-historical perspective in order to again be able to highly value the extraordinary position of Jesus’ parables. From the perspective of the literary form of the parables, all internal differentiation must be made invalid by the New Testament text record itself. Instead, the discussion of a comprehensive genre of “parable” utilises the genre consciousness of the early Christian authors; a genre that can be precisely defined by means of a literary-critical description in terms of the criteria of narrativity, fictionality, relation to reality, metaphor, appeal structure and co-/contextuality. From a hermeneutic perspective, this new approach consists of a conscious affirmation of a plurality of interpretations that is established by the texts themselves and that also guarantees the timeliness and liveliness of the interpretations in a variety of reading situations.
+===Bibelkritik===
+* Paul, William W. (1960): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/3/3-4/BETS_3-4_82-86_Paul.pdf Has there been a Shift in the Presuppositions of Criticism?]
+* Schultz, Samuel S. (1960): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/3/3-4/BETS_3-4_87-92_Schultz.pdf Today´s Critic - Presuppositions, Tools and Methods].
+* Tenney, Merrill C. (1960): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/3/3-4/BETS_3-4_89-92_Tenney.pdf The Legitimate Limits of Biblical Criticism].
+===<big>'''Geschichte der Exegese'''</big>===
+* Harris, Robert (?): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1726768/Harris_JewishBiblicalExegesis_596-615 Jewish Biblical Exegesis from its Beginnings to the Twelfth Century].
+'''Biblische Interpretation in parabiblischen Texten'''
+* Segal, Michael (1998): [http://huji.academia.edu/MichaelSegal/Papers/1528288/Biblical_Exegesis_in_4Q158_Techniques_and_Genre Biblical Exegesis in 4Q158: Techniques and Genre].
+* Segal, Michael (2011): [http://huji.academia.edu/MichaelSegal/Papers/1528169/Identifying_Biblical_Interpretation_in_Parabiblical_Texts Identifying Biblical Interpretation in Parabiblical Texts].
+'''Rabbinische Exegese'''
+* Cohen, Martin Samuel (1990): [http://jbq.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/18/jbq_18.4.pdf The Names of biblical Verses].
+: über den Aspekt rabbinischer Auslegung, einzelnen Versen Namen zu geben
+'''Mittelalterliche Exegese'''
+* De Visscher, Eva Sarah (2003): [http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1496/1/uk_bl_ethos_403057.pdf The Jewish-Christian Dialogue in Twelfth-Century Western Europe: the Hebrew and Latin Sources of Herbert of Bosham´s ''Commentary on the Psalms'']. Leeds.
+* Goldstein, Israel (1987): [http://jbq.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/15/jbq15.4.pdf Maimonides´ Approach to the Bible].
+* Harris, Robert (2007): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1834936/Rashis_Introductions_to_His_Biblical_Commentaries Rashi´s Introductions to His Biblical Commentaries].
+* Harris, Robert (2008): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1834932/Rashi_and_the_Messianic_Psalms Rashi and the 'Messianic' Psalms].
+* Harris, Robert (2009): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1838243/Medieval_Jewish_Biblical_Exegesis Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis].
+* Harris, Robert (2009): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1834925/Twelfth-Century_Biblical_Exegetes_and_the_Invention_of_Literature Twelfth-Century Biblical Exegetes and the Invention of Literature].
+* Harris, Robert (2011): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1601696/The_Reception_of_Ezekiel_in_Medieval_Jewish_Biblical_Exegesis The Reception of Ezekiel in Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis].
+* Harris, Robert (2011): [http://jtsa.academia.edu/RobertHarris/Papers/1726772/Leviticus_Interpreted_as_Jewish_Community Leviticus Interpreted as Jewish Community].

Neues Testament:
Matthäus Markus Lukas Johannes	Apostelgeschichte	Römer 1-2 Korinther Galater Epheser Philipper Kolosser 1-2 Thessalonicher 1-2 Timotheus Titus Philemon	Hebräer	Jakobus 1-2 Petrus 1-3 Johannes Judas	Offenbarung =Apokalypse
Altes Testament:
1M.=Genesis 2M.=Exodus 3M.=Levitikus 4M.=Numeri 5M.=Deuteronomium	Josua Richter 1-2 Samuel 1-2 Könige	Jesaja Jeremia Ezechiel =Hesekiel Hosea Joel Amos Obadja Jona Micha Nahum Habakuk Zefanja Haggai Sacharja Maleachi
Psalmen Ijob=Hiob Sprichwörter	1-2 Chronik Esra Nehemia	Daniel
Hohelied Kohelet=Prediger	Rut Ester	Klagelieder
Spätschriften zum Alten Testament:
Psalmen (Ergänzungen) Oden Weisheit Jesus Sirach	Esra (Ergänzungen) Judith Tobit Ester (griechische Version) 1-4 Makkabäer	Baruch Brief des Jeremia Daniel (griechische Version), Susanna, Bel

Sekundärliteratur:Biblische Exegese: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Die Offene Bibel

Aktuelle Version vom 18. September 2012, 07:26 Uhr

Methodik der Exegese

Bibelkritik

Geschichte der Exegese

Ansichten