Sekundärliteratur:Klagelieder: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Die Offene Bibel

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Sebastian Walter (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Sebastian Walter (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
Zeile 2: Zeile 2:


* Brady, C.M.M. (?): [http://targum.info/meg/tglam.htm Targum Lamentations]
* Brady, C.M.M. (?): [http://targum.info/meg/tglam.htm Targum Lamentations]
* Gous, I. G. P. (1992): [http://content.ajarchive.org/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/10109919&CISOPTR=463 A survey of reseach on the book of Lamentations].


* Kalman, J. (2009): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/55442/43914 If jeremiah wrote it, it must be ok: on the attribution of lamentations to jeremiah in early rabbinic texts], in: Acta Theologica 29/2. S. 31-53.
* Kalman, J. (2009): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/55442/43914 If jeremiah wrote it, it must be ok: on the attribution of lamentations to jeremiah in early rabbinic texts], in: Acta Theologica 29/2. S. 31-53.
: '''Abstract''': Despite the absence of any formal attribution of the book of Lamentations to the prophet Jeremiah in the Hebrew Bible, the rabbis of the Talmudic period chose to perpetuate and reinforce this idea. The question explored is how this benefited them. Using Jorge Gracia’s discussion of the “pseudo-historical author,” the influence of the rabbinic assumption of Jeremiah’s authorship of Lamentations on their exegesis of the book is explored. The rabbis were troubled by a number of theologically challenging verses and the claim of authorship opened the door to their use of the book of Jeremiah to explain away these difficulties.


* Kotzé, Gideon (2011): [http://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/6713/kotze_textcritical_2011.pdf?sequence=2 A text-ciritcal analysis of the Lamentations manuscripts from Qumran (3QLam, 4QLam, 5QLama and 5QLamb): establishing the content of an Old Testament book according to its textual witnesses among the Dead Sea Scrolls]. Stellenbosch.
* Kotzé, Gideon (2011): [http://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/6713/kotze_textcritical_2011.pdf?sequence=2 A text-ciritcal analysis of the Lamentations manuscripts from Qumran (3QLam, 4QLam, 5QLama and 5QLamb): establishing the content of an Old Testament book according to its textual witnesses among the Dead Sea Scrolls]. Stellenbosch.
: '''Abstract''': This study takes as its point of departure the contributions of the Dead Sea scrolls to the  discipline of Old Testament textual criticism. It deals with a particular approach to this discipline  and its application to the four Lamentations manuscripts from Qumran (3QLam, 4QLam, 5QLam a and 5QLam b). The approach to Old Testament textual criticism followed in the study treats the Qumran manuscripts of Lamentations, the Masoretic text and the ancient translations as witnesses to the content of the book and not merely as witnesses to earlier forms of its Hebrew wording. The unique readings in 3QLam, 4QLam, 5QLam a and 5QLam b and their difficult or ambiguous readings are subjected to a comparative text-critical analysis. This analysis focuses on how the variant readings in the Qumran manuscripts were created by scribes during the process of copying. It therefore examines the influence that the scribal transmission exercised on the wordings of the passages from Lamentations that are preserved in 3QLam, 4QLam, 5QLam a and 5QLam b. The analysis also considers whether comparative philology and/or the ancient. Greek, Syriac, Latin and Aramaic translations can shed light on the textual problems which the Hebrew wordings of the Lamentations manuscripts from Qumran share with the Masoretic text. The aims of this study are to establish, by means of this text-critical analysis, how the Lamentations manuscripts from Qumran present the content of the book and thereby gain a better understanding of these manuscripts as textual witnesses.

Aktuelle Version vom 22. September 2012, 20:29 Uhr