Sekundärliteratur:Kohelet: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Die Offene Bibel

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
KKeine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
(3 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
[[Kategorie:Kohelet]]
[[Kategorie:Kohelet]]


* Baranowski, Krzysztof J. (2011): [http://utoronto.academia.edu/Baranowski/Papers/1136249/The_Article_in_the_Book_of_Qoheleth._In_Saggi_di_linguistica_ebraica_in_onore_di_Alviero_Niccacci_ofm_edited_by_G._Geiger_and_M._Pazzini._2011._Milano_Franciscan_Printing_Press-Edizioni_Terra_Santa The Article in the Book of Qoheleth]
* Archer, G. L. (1969): [http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/12/12-3/12-3-pp167-181_JETS.pdf The Linguistic Evidence for the Date of „Ecclesiastes“].
 
* Baranowski, Krzysztof J. (2011): [http://utoronto.academia.edu/Baranowski/Papers/1136249/The_Article_in_the_Book_of_Qoheleth._In_Saggi_di_linguistica_ebraica_in_onore_di_Alviero_Niccacci_ofm_edited_by_G._Geiger_and_M._Pazzini._2011._Milano_Franciscan_Printing_Press-Edizioni_Terra_Santa The Article in the Book of Qoheleth] (academia.edu)


* Debel, H. (2010): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/67252/55352 Het boek Prediger: Een verrassende en uitdagende stem in de bijbel], in: Acta theologica 30/1. S. 39-51.
* Debel, H. (2010): [http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/67252/55352 Het boek Prediger: Een verrassende en uitdagende stem in de bijbel], in: Acta theologica 30/1. S. 39-51.
: '''Abstract''': As historical-critical exegesis has demonstrated that the bible does not provide a readymade and unified answer to each and every actual question, the present study aims at highlighting the particular contribution of the book of Qohelet to the ‘library’ of biblical books. Against the background of the church fathers’ christological interpretation of the book (1), emphasis is put on the need to situate and interpret the book in its original historical context (2), which has been identified — on account of its Late Biblical Hebrew linguistic profile – as the fourth or third century BCE. After some critical remarks on the traditional ascription of the book of Qohelet to king Salomon, its thematic statement that everything is ‘vanity’ (lbh) is presented and analysed (3). Finally, a plea is made for reading the book of Qohelet in the present, post-modern context as it expresses authentic existential doubt and, within this context, the need to enjoy the earthly life (4).
 
* DeWelt, Don / R. J. Kidwell (1977): [http://www.collegepress.com/cp/pdf/17%20Ecclesiastes%20and%20Song%20of%20Solomon.pdf Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon] (=Bible Study Textbook 16). Joplin.


* Gericke, Jacobus Wilhelm (2003): Possible allusions to ancient Near Eastern solar mythology in [http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-04202005-095806/ Qohelet] - a comprehensive enquiry.
* Gericke, Jacobus Wilhelm (2003): Possible allusions to ancient Near Eastern solar mythology in [http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-04202005-095806/ Qohelet] - a comprehensive enquiry.
* Spieckermann, Hermann (1998): [http://www.bsw.org/Biblica/Vol-79-1998/Suchen-Und-Finden-Kohelets-Kritische-Reflexionen/353/ Suchen und Finden. Kohelets kritische Reflexionen].

Aktuelle Version vom 19. Dezember 2013, 19:07 Uhr


  • Gericke, Jacobus Wilhelm (2003): Possible allusions to ancient Near Eastern solar mythology in Qohelet - a comprehensive enquiry.
Abgerufen von „https://offene-bibel.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Sekundärliteratur:Kohelet&oldid=13296“
Versionsgeschichte / Übersetzer·innen bzw. Autor·en dieser Seite
Bibelstelle/Suche 🔎
Ansichten